Commentary for Sanhedrin 46:3
ואי אשמעינן בהא בהא קאמר ר"מ אבל בההיא אימא מודו להו לרבנן צריכא
while the Rabbis saythat he is not so obliged.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Consequently, notwithstanding his first assertion, he can insist on basing his claims on the first pair of witnesses only, and so the defendant becomes an interested party in seeking to disqualify one of these witnesses. — Tosaf. and one interpretation of Rashi. Rashi, however, reverses the reading and gives another explanation. ');"><sup>12</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Sanhedrin 46:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.