Commentary for Shabbat 187:1

ששגג על האוכלין והזיד על הכלי מתקיף לה רב אשי והא אף על הכלי קתני אלא א"ר אשי כגון ששגג בזה ובזה ונודע לו וחזר ונודע לו ובפלוגתא דרבי יוחנן ור"ש בן לקיש:

where he sinned unwittingly in respect of the food, but deliberately in respect of the utensil.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And 'liable'- means to death, for the wilful desecration of the Sabbath. ');">¹</span> R. Ashi demurred: But it is stated, 'in respect of the utensil too'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which implies the same liability. ');">²</span> Rather said R. Ashi: E.g.. where he sinned unwittingly in respect of both, then [one offence] became known to him, and subsequently the other became known to him, this being dependent on the controversy of R. Johanan and Resh Lakish.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' v. supra 71b. Thus according to R. Johanan he is liable to two sin-offerings if he is apprised of each in succession, and then comes to make atonement for both. But in the view of Resh Lakish he is liable to two sacrifices only if he is apprised of one, makes atonement, and is then apprised of the other (Tosaf.). ');">³</span>

Explore commentary for Shabbat 187:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.