Commentary for Shabbat 293:10

כי אתא רבין אמר לא יהושע בן זירוז הוה אלא יהושע בן כפוסאי היה חתנו של ר' עקיבא אמר בזו לא חייב ר' עקיבא חטאת אמר לו דקדק ר"ע עד כאן שלשל רבי טליתו כי אתא רב שמואל בר רב יהודה אמר נשאל איתמר:

he said: It was not Joshua b. Ziruz but Joshua b. Kapusai, R. Akiba's son-in-law. Said he: Did not R. Akiba declare one liable to a sin-offering in such a case? Was R. Akiba so very particular? he exclaimed. [So] Rabbi let his cloak fall. When R. Samuel b. R. Judah came, he said: It was stated that this [question] was asked.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The incident did not actually happen, but the question was asked in the academy: Rabbi thought of permitting it, but was dissuaded when told of R. Meir's (or, R. Akiba's) view. ');">¹⁷</span> <b><i>MISHNAH</i></b>. IF ONE BATHES IN THE WATER OF A PIT<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which had been heated. ');">¹⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Shabbat 293:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.