Commentary for Shevuot 33:2
בעי רבא תלה עצמו באויר עזרה מהו כי גמירי שהייה שהייה דבת השתחואה דלאו בת השתחואה לא גמירי או דלמא בפנים שהייה גמירי ל"ש דבת השתחואה ול"ש דלאו בת השתחואה תיקו
what is the ruling? Is the tradition that tarrying makes him liable only in the case of such tarrying as may be used for prostration,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., when he is on the ground; but since he cannot prostrate himself in the air, he is not liable, even if he remains thus suspended for the period of tarrying.');"><sup>3</sup></span> but for such tarrying which cannot be used for prostration there is no tradition [that he is liable]?
Explore commentary for Shevuot 33:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.