Commentary for Shevuot 43:4

והרי נזיר מביא קרבנו על דבורו קאמרינן והאי מביא קרבן לאשתרויי ליה חמרא הוא דקא מייתי

Raba said: The controversy [between R. Akiba and the Sages] is in the case of an undefined oath, but if he expressly states [a minute quantity], all agree that he is liable for a minute quantity. What is the reason? An expressly defined oath is on a par with a 'creature'. And Raba said further: The controversy is only where he says, I shall not eat,' but if he says, I shall not taste, all agree that he is liable for a minute quantity. This is self-evident! - I might have thought that 'to taste' should be taken in the way that people talk, therefore he teaches us [that it is taken literally].

Explore commentary for Shevuot 43:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.