Commentary for Shevuot 78:17
אי הכי אימא סיפא שתי כסף ופרוטה יש לי בידך אין לך בידי אלא פרוטה חייב אי אמרת בשלמא שוה משום הכי חייב אלא אי אמרת דוקא אמאי חייב מה שטענו לא הודה לו ומה שהודה לו לא טענו
Since it is not required for the claim, apply it for the denial.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the denial must be at least two ma'ahs.');"><sup>24</sup></span> And Samuel? - He may say to you: If Scripture had written 'vessels', and had not written 'silver', I might have said: Just as 'vessel implies two, so everything must be two, but a thing of worth we do not require,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is not necessary that the two things claimed shall be valuable (for silver is not mentioned) , and even two perutahs suffice for a claim.');"><sup>25</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Shevuot 78:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.