Commentary for Shevuot 93:1
וכל דדמי ליה:
and all that are similar to it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' All oaths in the past which are false the moment they are uttered, just as a vain oath is, are included (as far as disqualifying the offender is concerned) in the category of VAIN OATH.');"><sup>1</sup></span> IF ONE OF THEM WAS A DICE-PLAYER'Wherefore is this necessary?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A dice-player is accounted a robber, and we have already been told that, in the case of a robber, the opponent takes the oath.');"><sup>2</sup></span> - He [the tanna] mentions a Biblical disqualification, and he mentions a Rabbinic disqualification.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A real robber is disqualified by Scripture from taking an oath; but a gambler, since he does not take his winnings by force but with the other's consent, is disqualified merely by the Rabbis.');"><sup>3</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Shevuot 93:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.