Commentary for Shevuot 97:3
<br><br><big><strong>הדרן עלך כל הנשבעין</strong></big><br><br>
- There is this difference: [whether the court] find an opening for him [to impose another oath].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to R. Huna, even if the claimant does not urge the imposing of other oaths, the court investigate and ask the claimant whether he has any further claims against the defendant in which an oath might be imposed; but according to R. Hisda the court are not lenient with the defendant if the claimant wishes to impose other oaths (and they permit the imposition) , but they do not themselves, if the claimant does not urge it, endeavour to find an opening for the imposition of other oaths (Rashi) .');"><sup>4</sup></span> BUT THE SABBATICAL YEAR CANCELS THE OATH.
Explore commentary for Shevuot 97:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.