Commentary for Temurah 26:37

<br><br><big><strong>הדרן עלך הכל ממירין</strong></big><br><br>

what is the ruling? And if you adopt the opinion that one kind of holiness cannot<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Inserted with Sh. Mek.');">²⁸</span> [effect exchange again], what is the ruling in the case o two kinds of holiness and one body?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., if one were atoned for through another guilt-offering and the first lost guilt-offering was then found and transformed into a burnt-offering. Thus here there are two kinds of holiness with the same body. hgch, ueh,');">²⁹</span> Let this question remain.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' is the term of the Jerusalem Talmud and has the same meaning as in the Babylonian Talmud.');">³⁰</span> MISHNAH

Explore commentary for Temurah 26:37. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.