Commentary for Temurah 40:43
א"ל
Rather, if the statement was made, it was made in this form: R'Nahman reported in the name of Rabbah B'Abbuha: The dispute applies before atonement has taken place,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Eliezer holds there that the young dies. For if you say that the young pastures, since what is bought for its money is offered, it might be substituted and itself offered as a guilt-offering. The Rabbis, however, will maintain that since the animal itself is not offered as a burnt-offering, there is no fear of substitution (Rashi) .');"><sup>33</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Temurah 40:43. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.