Commentary for Temurah 47:15

לפי שאין חטאת צבור מתה

Now it is to be assumed that R'Eleazar son of R'Simeon agrees with the opinion of Rabbi,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who holds that a sin-offering set aside in place of a lost sin-offering has the law of a lost sin-offering. We therefore see that even where there is no case of a lost sin-offering, as here in the Mishnah, where the first sin-offering was not lost but became blemished, and he set aside another in its place, it is also condemned to die (Rashi) .');">⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Temurah 47:15. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.