Commentary for Temurah 8:1
אפטורא קאי והכי קאמר
was speaking of exempting [from lashes];<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Jose b. R. Hanina's statement has reference to the first Tanna who holds that transgression of a negative command which does not involve an action is not punishable with lashes. R. Jose thereupon declares that the case also of one who named terumah before bikkurim is exempt from lashes for the same reason. This is contrary to the assumption held hitherto that R. Jose made him liable to lashes.');"><sup>1</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Temurah 8:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.