Commentary for Yevamot 112:11

מתיב רבי זירא והיא לא נתפשה אסורה הא נתפשה מותרת ויש לך אחרת שאף על פי שנתפשה אסורה ואיזו זו אשת כהן ולאו הבא מכלל עשה עשה

Others say: Rabbah stated, If the wife of a priest had been outraged, her husband suffers for her the penalty of flogging<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If he has intercourse with her. ');">²⁶</span> on account of 'defilement'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V.supra p. 379, n. 8. ');">²⁷</span> Only on account of 'defilement' but not for [connubial relationship with] a harlot. Thus it is obvious that [when the woman acted] under compulsion she is not to be regarded as a harlot. R. Zera raised an objection: 'And she be not seized,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Num. V, 13. E.V., neither she be taken in the act. ');">²⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 112:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.