Commentary for Yevamot 112:16

אמרו לו לא אם אמרת בקידושי רשות שכן אין לו להאכיל במקום אחר תאמר בקדושי עבירה שכן יש לו להאכיל במקום אחר

<b><i>MISHNAH</i></b>. THE BETROTHAL OF A WIDOW TO A HIGH PRIEST AND OF A DIVORCED WOMAN OR A <i>HALIZAH</i> TO A COMMON PRIEST<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since such betrothal is unlawful. ');">⁴⁰</span> DOES NOT CONFER UPON THEM THE RIGHT TO EAT <i>TERUMAH</i>.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If they were the daughters of Israelites. If they were the daughters of priests, their right to the eating of terumah which they enjoyed prior to their betrothal, ceases with the forbidden betrothal. (V. Rashi s.v. rjt iuak a.l.) According to Tosaf. (s.v. in a.l.) the Mishnah refers to the daughters of priests only. Cf. also [H] a.l. ');">⁴¹</span> R. ELEAZAR AND R. SIMEON, HOWEVER, DECLARE THEM ELIGIBLE.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' During the period of betrothal, so long as actual marriage has not taken place. ');">⁴²</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 112:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.