Commentary for Yevamot 115:4

אלא אי איכא למימר בפלוגתא דהני תנאי דתניא נישאו זו וזו כשרות ופסולות או שנכנסו לחופה ולא נבעלו אוכלות משלו ואוכלות בתרומה

Must it not [consequently be concluded that the meaning is], 'as, for instance,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the expression 'or', [H] is to be understood as the equivalent of 'as for instance' [H], and the clause following is an illustration of the preceding one. ');">⁶</span> when they entered the bridal chamber without any intercourse having taken place'? And yet it was stated that 'they are entitled to sustenance from his estate and are also permitted to eat terumah'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which proves that, even where the union was a forbidden one, the entry into the bridal chamber alone does not deprive a woman of the right of eating terumah if she was previously entitled to it. ');">⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 115:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.