Commentary for Yevamot 116:4
רב פפא אמר האי תנא הוא דתניא אין מקנין לה לארוסה להשקותה כשהיא ארוסה אבל מקנין אותה להשקותה כשהיא נשואה
If so, she would be identical with the 'betrothed woman'!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Whose case had been specifically mentioned. Why should the same law be mentioned twice? ');"><sup>9</sup></span> — And according to your view, has not a 'married woman' and 'one taken [by the levir]' the same status?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And both were nevertheless specified. ');"><sup>10</sup></span> But [the explanation must be that] 'a married woman' refers to one's own wife, and 'one taken [by the levir]' refers to that of another man.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., his brother's widow whom he married. ');"><sup>11</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Yevamot 116:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.