Commentary for Yevamot 132:7
אמר רבא אמר רב נחמן הלכה כרב יהודה א"ל רבא לרב נחמן והתניא כותיה דר' אמי אע"ג דתניא כותיה דר' אמי מסתברא טעמא דרב יהודה משום שבח בית אביה
may seize them from the buyers.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If the woman died; the sale being deemed invalid. That the woman, when her husband dies or divorces her, may seize such property, in the event of a sale by him, is obvious. ');"><sup>18</sup></span> Raba<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Wanting in MSS. which read 'R. Nahman stated'. ');"><sup>19</sup></span> stated in the name of R. Nahman: The law is in agreement with Rab Judah. Said Raba to R. Nahman: But surely [a Baraitha] was taught in agreement with R. Ammi! Although [a Baraitha] was taught in agreement with R. Ammi, Rab Judah's view is more logical, since any asset of a woman's paternal property [should rightly belong to her].
Explore commentary for Yevamot 132:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.