Commentary for Yevamot 144:3

אלא דכולי עלמא משוך דרבנן וקטן שעבר זמנו דאורייתא והכא בהא קמיפלגי מר סבר דרשינן וביום ומר סבר לא דרשינן וביום

agree that the circumcision of a <i>mashuk</i> is a Rabbinical ordinance,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In agreement with R. Huna's ruling. ');">⁹</span> and that the duty to circumcise a child whose proper time of circumcision had passed, is Pentateuchal. Here,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the Baraitha cited. ');">¹⁰</span> however, their difference depends on the following principle: One Master<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra note 7. ');">¹¹</span> holds that [the conjunctive in the expression]. And in the day<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Waw (and) in [H], Lev. XII, 3. ');">¹²</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 144:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.