Commentary for Yevamot 149:13

פצוע דכא וכו': מאן תנא משתמרת לביאה פסולה דאורייתא אכלה א"ר אלעזר במחלוקת שנויה ורבי אלעזר ורבי שמעון היא

to <i>terumah</i>. But might not the deduction be reversed? — It stands to reason that as the eating of <i>terumah</i> is more restricted than the eating of tithe, so shall the touching of <i>terumah</i> be more restricted than the touching of tithe. If you prefer I might say that the prohibition against the touching of <i>terumah</i><span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the part of a tebul yom. V. Glos. ');">³¹</span> is deduced from the following. It was taught:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So BaH. Cur. edd. omit. ');">³²</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 149:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.