Commentary for Yevamot 169:16

אמר ר"ש בן אלעזר מפני מה אמרו אלמנה לכ"ג יש לה כתובה מפני שהוא פסול והיא פסולה וכ"מ שהוא פסול והיא פסולה

but she becomes thereby unfit, and her child is unfit, and [the husband] is compelled to divorce her. Relatives of the second grade of kinship [who are forbidden] by the ordinances of scribes are entitled neither to <i>kethubah</i>, nor to usufruct,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Consumed by the husband from her melog (v. Glos.) property. ');">⁴⁵</span> nor to alimony<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. nn. on our Mishnah. ');">⁴⁶</span> nor to worn clothes;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. nn. on our Mishnah. ');">⁴⁶</span> the woman remains fit and her child is fit; but [the husband] is compelled to divorce her. R. Simeon b. Eleazar said, 'Why was it ordained that a widow married to a High Priest is entitled to her <i>kethubah</i>? Because he becomes unfit<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' He is not permitted to perform the Temple service as long as he refuses to part with her. V. Bek. 45b and Git. 35b. ');">⁴⁷</span> and she becomes unfit and wherever he becomes unfit and she becomes unfit<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [Tosaf.: 'Wherever he becomes unfit or she becomes unfit'. The resulting unfitness of either of them is sufficient to act as a deterrent to the woman in view of the effect it has on the child's fitness. R. Tam, on the other hand, whilst agreeing with this rendering, takes 'he' as referring to the child]. ');">⁴⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 169:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.