Commentary for Yevamot 173:6

מתקיף לה רמי בר חמא אימא פרט להפרת נדרים אמר רבא כבר פסקה תנא דבי רבי ישמעאל דתנא דבי ר' ישמעאל (במדבר ל, י) ונדר אלמנה וגרושה יקום עליה מה ת"ל והלא מוצאה מכלל אב ומוצאה מכלל בעל

this excludes the breast and the shoulder.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which are also among the priestly gifts. Cf. Ex. XXIX, 27, Lev. VII, 34 X, 14. ');">¹²</span> Rami b. Hama demurred: Might it not be suggested that this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The limitation implied by the Mem. V. supra n. 16. ');">¹⁹</span> excludes the invalidation of vows!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By her father; even when his daughter returns to his house and resumes her right to eat terumah. Before marriage, a daughter's vows may be invalidated by her father. Cf. Num. XXX, 4ff. ');">²⁰</span> Raba replied: A Tanna of the school of R. Ishmael has long ago settled this difficulty. For a Tanna of the School of R. Ishmael taught: What need was there for Scripture to state, But the vow of a widow, or of her that is divorced&nbsp;… shall stand against her?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Num. XXX, 10. ');">²¹</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 173:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.