Commentary for Yevamot 174:10
ואין לה כתובה ולא פירות ולא מזונות ולא בלאות לא על זה ולא על זה ואם נטלה מזה ומזה תחזיר
Then let the child of the first husband not be regarded as the child of the second husband, in respect of <i>terumah</i>, by inference a minori ad majus: If where the dead were given the same status as the living, in respect of exempting her from the levirate marriage, the child of the first husband was not regarded as the child of the second,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra p. 589, n. 12. ');"><sup>22</sup></span> how much less should the child of the first husband be regarded as the child of the second, where the dead were not regarded as the living in respect of eating <i>terumah</i>!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra p. 590, n. 2. ');"><sup>21</sup></span> — It was specifically stated, And [she] have none,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XXII, 13. ');"><sup>25</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Yevamot 174:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.