Commentary for Yevamot 191:1

ודלמא אאינו פוסל אי נמי ממאי דאיתא לדרב הונא דלמא ליתא דרב הונא כלל ובדרב המנונא קמיפלגי דאמר רב המנונא שומרת יבם שזינתה אסורה ליבמה

Is it not possible [that he referred] to the ruling 'DOES NOT DISQUALIFY'!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The case of one's wife and brother-in-law-; Samuel indicating that in this case, and in this case alone, the halachah is in agreement with R. Jose that the sister-in-law is permitted to her first husband contrary to the view of the first Tanna who forbids her. ');">¹</span> Or else [it might be argued], whence is it proved that R. Huna's explanation<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra 95b. ');">²</span> is tenable? Is it not possible that R. Huna's explanation is altogether untenable and that they<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rab and Samuel. ');">³</span> differ on the ruling of R. Hamnuna who stated that 'A woman awaiting the decision of the levir, who played the harlot, is forbidden to her levir';<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cit. 80b, Sot 18b, supra 95a. ');">⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 191:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.