Commentary for Yevamot 191:3

והא אפליגו בה חדא זימנא חדא מכלל דחברתה איתמר:

differ on the question whether betrothal of a sister-in-law<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To a stranger before she had performed halizah. ');">⁷</span> is valid, Rab maintaining that she 'has the status of a married woman' and betrothal<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To a stranger before she had performed halizah. ');">⁷</span> with her is, in consequence, invalid, while Samuel maintains that 'she has not the status of a married woman' and betrothal<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To a stranger before she had performed halizah. ');">⁷</span> with her is, therefore, valid. But on this question<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The validity of betrothal of a sister- in-law. V. supra n. 7. ');">⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 191:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.