Commentary for Yevamot 202:3

ואידך האי ישראל מאי עביד ליה מיבעי ליה לכדתני רב שמואל בר יהודה בישראל בב"ד של ישראל ולא בב"ד של גרים

— He requires it for a deduction like that which R. Samuel b. Judah taught: 'In Israel' [implies that <i>halizah</i> must be performed] at a <i>Beth din</i> of Israelites but not at a <i>Beth din</i> of proselytes.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. Kid. 14a. ');">¹¹</span> And the other?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Judah. ');">⁴</span> — 'In Israel' is written a second time.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra n. 7. ');">¹²</span> And the former?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first Tanna. ');">⁹</span> — He requires it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The second expression, In Israel. ');">¹³</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 202:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.