Commentary for Yevamot 205:6

אלא אמר רבא מדרישא רבי מאיר סיפא נמי רבי מאיר האי מגין והאי לא מגין

Rather, said Raba, since the first statement represents the view of R. Meir, the latter also represents the view of R. Meir, the one<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The artificial foot. ');">¹¹</span> affording protection<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the Ieg. Hence it is regarded as a shoe that is admissible for halizah. ');">¹⁵</span> while the other<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A cloth sock. ');">¹⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 205:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.