Commentary for Yevamot 206:9
אמר רב פפי משמיה דרבא סנדל המוסגר לא תחלוץ בו ואם חלצה חליצתה כשרה סנדל המוחלט לא תחלוץ בו ואם חלצה חליצתה פסולה
with his wooden stump; so R. Meir,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who regards the cripple's wooden stump as a proper shoe. ');"><sup>26</sup></span> while R. Jose forbids it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Shab. 25b. As in respect of the Sabbath R. Meir regards the stump as a shoe, so also in respect of halizah does he regard it as a shoe. ');"><sup>27</sup></span> Samuel's father explained:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Our Mishnah. Cf. supra n. 7. ');"><sup>28</sup></span> With one that is covered with leather, [the ruling representing] the general opinion.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' All agree that a wooden stump that is furnished with a leather covering is admissible for halizah. ');"><sup>29</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Yevamot 206:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.