Commentary for Yevamot 216:12

שכרו אדם אחד בארבע מאות זוז ושאלו את ר' עקיבא בבית האסורין ואסר את רבי יהודה בן בתירה בנציבין ואסר

did not teach the latter.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'this'. ');">²⁵</span> 'Ulla replied: [The latter statement refers to a case where], for instance, she was thrice divorced, so that she appears like a grown up.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is in such a case only that she may not he remarried to any of the men, even though her separation from her last husband was by mi'un. If, however, she was divorced once or twice only, the mi'un against her last husband confirms her in the state of her minority, and she may be married again by either of the men who had previously divorced her. ');">²⁶</span> Who taught [the two respective statements of our Mishnah]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Concerning which it was said supra that they represent the views of different authors. ');">²⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 216:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.