Commentary for Yevamot 216:7

הא כבר שבשא ולא אישבשא

cancels his own divorce, but that the <i>mi'un</i> against his fellow<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Spoken of in the second statement. ');">¹⁴</span> does not cancel his own letter of divorce! But in what way is the <i>mi'un</i> against his fellow different from one against himself] that it should not cancel his own<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first husband. ');">¹⁵</span> divorce? [Obviously for the reason that] as she is familiar with his<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first husband. ');">¹⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 216:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.