Commentary for Yevamot 219:11

אמר רב גידל אמר רב אביאה רבא אמר אפילו תימא אחליצה כאן בחרשת מעיקרא כאן בפקחת ואח"כ נתחרשה

woman permitted to perform <i>halizah</i>? Surely, we learned: If a deaf levir submitted to <i>halizah</i> or a deaf sister-in-law performed <i>halizah</i>, or if <i>halizah</i> was performed on a minor, the <i>halizah</i> is invalid!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra 104b. How then could it be said in our Mishnah. AND THE SAME LAW IS APPLICABLE TO TWO DEAF WOMEN? ');">⁴³</span> — R. Giddal replied in the name of Rab: [This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The law in our Mishnah concerning two deaf women. V. supra n. 3. ');">⁴⁴</span> applies] to COHABITATION.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Not to halizah. ');">⁴⁵</span> Raba<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Others, 'Rabbah'. Cf. infra p. 772, n. 8. ');">⁴⁶</span> replied: It<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra note 4. ');">⁴⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 219:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.