Commentary for Yevamot 219:4

צריכא דאי איתמר ההיא בההיא קאמר רב משום דאיכא תנאה וכיון דבעל אחליה לתנאיה אבל בהא אימא מודה ליה לשמואל ואי איתמר בהא בהך קאמר שמואל אבל בהך אימא מודה ליה לרב צריכא

but in the latter case,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'that'; cited from Keth. 72b. ');">¹⁴</span> where a condition was attached to it, he agrees with Samuel.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the original condition remains in force even after consummation of the marriage. ');">¹⁵</span> And if the latter case<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'that'; cited from Keth. 72b. ');">¹⁴</span> only had been stated, it might have been assumed that there only<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the condition was attached to the original betrothal, ');">¹⁶</span> does Samuel maintain his view<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the marriage remains dependent on the original condition and is, therefore, invalid. ');">¹⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 219:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.