Commentary for Yevamot 221:8

הא מני רבי נחמיה היא דאמר ביאה פסולה פוטרת מחליצה

or not acquired [at all], and that a minor is partially acquired,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 773, n. 7. ');">²⁰</span> [the difficulty arises] why should the deaf widow, if he cohabited with her and gave her a letter of divorce, be permitted [to marry again] when the cohabitation with her was unlawful,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the minor is at least partially his wife and the deaf widow is forbidden to him as his wife's sister. ');">²⁵</span> and an unlawful cohabitation does not release a woman?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From the levirate obligations. Since it is possible that the deaf woman was completely acquired as wife by the deceased brother, the levirate bond between her and the levir is also fully valid, and as the partial acquisition of the minor by her husband (the levir) cannot annul such a possibly fully valid bond, the deaf widow is precluded from marrying either the levir whose partial wife's sister she is (cf. supra n. 9) or from marrying any other man to whom she can be permitted only through halizah with the levir, which she, as a deaf person, is incapable of performing. Had she been permitted to marry the levir, his cohabitation with her would have released her from any further levirate obligation, while his divorce would have set her free to marry any other man. Since, however, cohabitation with the levir is unlawful, she cannot thereby be released from her levirate obligation and should consequently remain forbidden to all men forever! ');">²⁶</span> — It is possible that this statement represents the view of<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'this, who?' ');">²⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 221:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.