Commentary for Yevamot 222:4

פקחת וחרשת בא יבם על הפקחת וחזר ובא על החרשת או שבא אחיו על החרשת לא פסל את הפקחת

state: The <i>halachah</i> is in agreement with R. Eleazar.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Eleazar b. Shammua', the Tanna in our Mishnah. ');">⁷</span> And [both statements<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That (a) the halachah is in agreement with R. Eleazar in our Mishnah and that (b) it is also in agreement with R. Eliezer's view in the Mishnah supra 109a, as stated in the Gemara supra 110a. ');">⁸</span> were] required. For if the statement had been made on the first [Mishnah] only<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' With reference to Mishnah 109a which deals with the levirate marriage of two sisters, cf. however supra p. 760, n. 5. ');">⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 222:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.