Commentary for Yevamot 225:16

שמואל סבר כר' אלעזר בחדא ופליג עליה בחדא

as profane, because its validity is a matter of doubt.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Shab. 153a. The invalidity of the terumah spoken of in the Mishnah cited may consequently be due to a similar reason. Hence no support for Samuel's view concerning a deaf man's wife may be adduced from it. ');">⁴³</span> If he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Samuel. ');">⁴⁰</span> is of the same opinion as R. Eleazar,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the validity of the deaf man's action, and consequently also his capacity, is a matter of doubt. ');">⁴⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 225:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.