Commentary for Yevamot 226:14

מי לא אמר רבי יוחנן בן גודגדא לא בעינן דעתה הכא נמי לא בעינן דעתה פשיטא

R. JOHANAN&nbsp;… TESTIFIED etc. Raba stated: From the testimony of R. Johanan b. Gudgada<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to which a woman may be divorced without her consent even though her betrothal was Pentateuchally valid. ');">³²</span> [it may be inferred that if a husband] said to witnesses, 'See this letter of divorce which I am giving [to my wife]', and to her he said,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When handing the letter of divorce to her. ');">³³</span> 'Take this bill of indebtedness', she is nevertheless divorced. For did not R. Johanan b. Gudgada imply that [the woman's] consent was not required?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra p. 799, n. 13. ');">³⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 226:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.