Commentary for Yevamot 232:1
איכא בינייהו דארגיל הוא קטטה
— The practical difference between them arises in the case where [the husband] created<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'accustomed', i.e., introduced. ');"><sup>1</sup></span> the discord.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' While the wife shewed no hatred towards him. As she does not hate him she would not invent a lie in order to get rid of him but would nevertheless readily believe that he was dead should he ever have found himself in a position of danger. She would not take the trouble to ascertain whether her conjecture was not groundless. ');"><sup>2</sup></span> The question was raised: What [is the law in respect of] one witness in a case of discord? Is the reason why one witness is [elsewhere]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When he gives evidence that a husband died in normal circumstances. ');"><sup>3</sup></span> believed<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the widow is allowed to marry again. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Yevamot 232:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.