Commentary for Yevamot 232:13

לימא רבנן דאמרי כב"ש ור' חנניא בן עקיבא דאמר כב"ה

hold the same view as Beth Shammai<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since both hold that the restrictions apply not only to conditions which are exactly the same as those of the original incident but to any other condition also. ');">⁴²</span> while R. Hanania b. Akabia holds the same view as Beth Hillel?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra n. 3 mutatis mutandis, Is it likely. however, that the Rabbis and R. Hanania would differ from Beth Hillel and Beth Shammai respectively! ');">⁴³</span> — The Rabbis can answer you: Our ruling agrees with the view<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'we (as to) what we said'. ');">⁴⁴</span> of Beth Hillel also; for Beth Hillel maintained their opinion<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Restricting the law to conditions exactly similar to those of the original incident. ');">⁴⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 232:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.