Commentary for Yevamot 232:7

<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> תניא אמרו להם בית שמאי לבית הלל לדבריכם אין לי אלא קציר חטים קציר שעורים מנין ואין לי אלא קוצר בוצר מוסק גודר עודר מנין

BETH HILLEL, THEREFORE, CHANGED THEIR VIEW [THENCEFORWARD] TO RULE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF BETH SHAMMAI. <b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. It was taught: Beth Shammai said to Beth Hillel, According to your View,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That a wife's evidence regarding the death of her husband may be accepted only in circumstances similar to those of the original incident. (Cf. supra n. 4). ');">²³</span> one would only know the law concerning<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'I have but'. ');">²⁴</span> the wheat harvest;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The incident (cf. supra note 4) having occurred during the wheat harvest. ');">²⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 232:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.