Commentary for Yevamot 236:6

מדקאמר רבי שמעון בן אלעזר בקידש ולקח לא פליגי מכלל דתנא קמא סבר פליגי מני

do not differ in the case where a man betrothed or purchased, it may be inferred that the first Tanna is of the opinion that they<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Tarfon and R. Akiba. ');">⁹</span> did differ. Whose [view then, is presented in our Mishnah]? If it is that of the first Tanna 'betrothal' and purchase should have been mentioned,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And not those of 'betrothal' and robbery ');">¹⁰</span> and if [it is that of] R. Simeon b. Eleazar cohabitation and 'robbery' should have been mentioned!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Not those if betrothal and 'robbery'. ');">¹¹</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 236:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.