Commentary for Yevamot 62:4

אלא אמר רבא כל שיש בקידושין יש בגירושין ויש בגירושין מה שאין בקידושין וזהו דגירושין לאו דוקא אלא משום דתנא זהו בקידושין תנא נמי זהו בגירושין וזהו דקידושין למעוטי מאי למעוטי זמן דליכא בקידושין

which was mentioned in the case of divorce is not to be taken literally. as THIS IS was used in connection with betrothal<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where THIS IS excludes the question of date, which is not applicable to it but to divorce only. ');">⁹</span> only because it was also used in connection with divorce. What was THIS IS mentioned in connection with betrothal meant to exclude? — To exclude the question of date which is inapplicable to betrothal.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The date does not matter in a document whereby betrothal is effected. V. infra. ');">¹⁰</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 62:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.