Commentary for Yevamot 66:1

ואיסור כולל אתנייה ואליבא דר' שמעון וחזיא לבר קפרא לזר שאכל מליקה ואיידי דדמיא לה ערבה בהדייהו ועיין בה ולא אשכח אלא בבת אחת

and [thereby he, in fact.] taught him the law of comprehensive prohibition<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though when the prohibitions in these cases should happen to be simultaneous, the double penalty would undoubtedly be imposed. ');">¹</span> in accordance with the view of R. Simeon. Bar Kappara. however, considered the case of a common man who ate melikah and, as it seemed to be similar to the others, he treated it like the others.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'mixed it up with them'; as those are cases where the transgressor is exempt from one of the penalties, so' he thought. was that of melikah. ');">²</span> When, later, he examined it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Melikah. ');">³</span> and found it to be possible only as a case of simultaneity of prohibitions. he imagined that as this one<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Melikah. ');">³</span> is a case of simultaneity so are also the others cases of simultaneity;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the same law is applicable to them whether the case is that of a comprehensive prohibition' or, like melikah, one of 'simultaneous prohibitions'. ');">⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 66:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.