Commentary for Yevamot 66:4

למאן שיירה אילימא לרבי יוסי השתא ר' יוסי באיסור כולל מיחייב שתים באיסור בת אחת מיבעיא אלא לאו לר' שמעון ובאיסור כולל הוא דפטר אבל באיסור בבת אחת מיחייב תיובתא דבר קפרא תיובתא

who thus grants exemption only where the prohibition is comprehensive<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As in the two cases mentioned. ');">¹⁴</span> but imposes both penalties when the prohibitions are simultaneous — 15 This, then, is a refutation against Bar Kappara!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who maintained supra that even in simultaneous prohibitions R. Simeon exempts from one of the penalties. ');">¹⁶</span> This is indeed a refutation. 'If a common man performed some Temple service on the Sabbath'. Of what nature? If slaughtering, slaughtering is permitted by a common man.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence no prohibition of 'service by a common man' is here involved. ');">¹⁷</span> If reception<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of the sacrificial blood in a basin for sprinkling purposes. ');">¹⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 66:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.