Commentary for Yevamot 66:7

אמר רב אחא בר יעקב בשחיטת פרו של כהן גדול וכדברי האומר שחיטת פרו של כהן גדול בזר פסולה אי הכי מאי איריא זר אפילו כהן הדיוט נמי שזר אצלו קאמר

R. Ashi demurred: Was any mention made of sin-offerings or of negative precepts?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which entail flagellation. ');">²⁹</span> Surely, only forbidden acts were spoken of!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since no actual penalty. either of a sin offering or flagellation, is involved, what matters it whether the two offences are regarded as one or as two? V. next note. ');">³⁰</span> — The point at issue is whether he is to be buried among confirmed sinners.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 204, n. 1. [Aliter: Since no actual penalty is involved the reference might indeed be to 'burning', the practical point at issue being whether he is to be buried among confirmed sinners.] ');">³¹</span> <b><i>MISHNAH</i></b>. IF TWO MEN BETROTHED TWO WOMEN, AND AS THESE WERE ENTERING INTO THE BRIDAL CHAMBER, THEY EXCHANGED THE ONE FOR THE OTHER, BEHOLD, THEY<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The men if they had intercourse with the women. ');">³²</span> ARE GUILTY OF AN OFFENCE AGAINST A MARRIED WOMAN. IF THEY<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The men if they had intercourse with the women. ');">³²</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 66:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.