Commentary for Yoma 100:11

אמר רב ששת לא באילו של אהרן

Hence the reference here must be to the [high priest's] bullock, and [it is stated that] 'it suspends both Sabbath and impurity laws' because it has a definite time; and 'renders its substitute [valid]' - because It is the offering of an individual!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which solves the question of R. Eleazar.');">¹²</span> -Said R'Shesheth: No, the reference here is to the ram of Aaron.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e.,the ram brought by the high priest for his own atonement on the Day of Atonement, v. Lev. XVI, 3.');">¹³</span>

Explore commentary for Yoma 100:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.