Commentary for Yoma 122:2
ולר' אלעזר ור' שמעון שאומרים ממקום שפסק משם הוא מתחיל הכא אין לו תקנה
R'Hisda demurred to them: Surely it is written: 'It'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XIV, 12: 'And offer it as a guilt-offering', i.e., only the one which has been waved together with the oil. This unequivocal statement of the Torah R. Meir too must accept, hence the interpretation just offered is to be rejected.');"><sup>3</sup></span> - This is a refutation. It was taught in accord with R'Johanan: If the guilt-offering of a leper had been slaughtered not for its own purpose, or if one had not sprinkled of its blood upon the thumbs and toes, it is considered a burnt-offering in regard to the altar and requires the [prescribed]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Num. XV, 1ff.');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Yoma 122:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.