Commentary for Yoma 125:1

שחטן בחוץ קודם שנפתחו דלתות ההיכל פטור מ"ט מחוסר פתיחה כמחוסר מעשה דמי

if someone had slain them outside before the doors of the Temple had been open, he would be free, because the lack of opening is like the lack of a [direct] action.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that the offerings were not fit for Temple use, and thus involve no guilt when offered outside. khtuv kgh g t tv ukht');">¹</span> But does R'Hisda adopt the principle of 'since'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' either derived from - and interchange frequently - thus: it helps - and followed by - 'because' since; or + 'look kth now, if', i.e., once this is so, that also may be granted; or from the Biblical 'accepted, agreed that this is so, that also ought to be accepted', implying that because something is permitted in one case, the permission should be extended to all analogous cases.');">²</span>

Explore commentary for Yoma 125:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.