Commentary for Yoma 125:12
ואיזהו מחוסר זמן בבעלים הזב והזבה והיולדת והמצורע
If the owner, either man or woman, was afflicted with gonorrhoea, or was a woman after child-birth or a leper and had offered up their sin-offering or their guilt-offering outside [before the appointed time], they are free.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Lev. XV, 14, 29; XII, 6, XIV, 10.');"><sup>8</sup></span> But if they offered up their whole-offerings or their peace-offerings outside, they are culpable.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the case of sin-offerings or guilt-offerings, which were offered up outside before they were due, no culpability is involved, because they are not acceptable within before their time has come, neither as obligatory nor as freewill-offerings. But burnt-offerings or/and peace-offerings, which are accepted even when not obligatory, are fit to be offered up within even before the appointed time, hence they involve culpability when offered up without. V. Zeb. 112b.');"><sup>9</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Yoma 125:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.