Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Yoma 132:11

לא מפני שהפליגן בדברים אלא מפני שלא אמר דבר שלא שמע מפי רבו מעולם

They asked R'Eliezer: 'What about So-and-so<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Peloni. It may have been a general question concerning 'John Doe', or it may refer to Solomon's (Rashi) , or to Absalom's (R. Han.) regard for the Davidic Dynasty being responsible for the substitution of the vague Peloni. [Some see in Peloni a reference to Jesus, Finkelstein L. to Philo. Bokser, B.Z Pharisaism in Transition pp. 18ff, rightly regards these identifications as hardly supported by any facts.]');"><sup>14</sup></span> in the world to come'? - He replied, 'Have you asked me only about this one'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ali his answers are evasive.');"><sup>15</sup></span>

Explore commentary for Yoma 132:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse