Commentary for Yoma 28:6

ורמי סדר יומא אסדר יומא דתנן פייס השני מי שוחט מי זורק מי מדשן מזבח הפנימי ומי מדשן את המנורה ומי מעלה אברים לכבש פייס השלישי חדשים לקטורת בואו והפיסו

And with reference to this [Mishnaic statement] it was taught: Rabbi Simeon of Mizpah has this change in Tamid:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [ a difficult phrase. Rashi: 'To change the order in connection with the Tamid, the daily regular offerings'. R. Hananel: He hbn, differs with the view laid down in Tamid. Ginzberg, op. cit., p. 285 n. 1 takes it as corresponding to , 'teaches', used in introducing 'variants': R. Simeon's version of Tamid is . .]');">¹¹</span> As he came to the north-eastern corner he sprinkled it to the east and to the north; then he came to the south-western corner, and sprinkled it to the west and afterwards to the south.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Simeon insists that two separate applications had to be made from the south-western corner, one to the west and another to the south, and thus opposes the order given in Tamid, v. infra 15a, hence he could not be an authority for the Tractate.');">¹²</span> - Rather, said R'Johanan: Who is the authority for the order [given] in [the Tractate] Yoma?

Explore commentary for Yoma 28:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.