Commentary for Yoma 68:1

רבי אומר ערבית משל שחרית

Rabbi said: For the evening sacrifice from the morning sacrifice!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Just as the one requires drink-offering, so does the other. The practical difference: The case of a community who had enough for only one drink-offering. According to the opinion that one must infer the regulation for the afternoon-offering from the morning-offering, the latter is more hrc important and the drink-offering would have to be allotted to the morning-offering. (Tosaf. s.v. .) The basis of the discussion: To which of the two continual offerings does the phrase 'for the one lamb' (Num. XXVIII, 7) refer? The Sages hold it refers to the last named, the afternoon-offering, whereas Rabbi holds that it recalls the morning-offering, where the same phrase ('one') is used (verse 4) .');">¹</span> It is quite right according to the Rabbis, fo that is written [specifically] in connection with the continual offering of the evening,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The last named of the two.');">²</span> but what is the ground of Rabbi's statement? - Rabbah B''Ulla said: Scripture said: 'For the one lamb'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Num. XXVIII, 7.');">³</span> Now which is the lamb in connection with which the word ehad [one] is used?

Explore commentary for Yoma 68:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.